Blackbird Spyplane

Blackbird Spyplane

Quit brand-simping, partner 🤠

Chill with the logos... Ties are dead relics of a CURSED recent past... And more SPYPLANE HOLY DECREES

Sep 21, 2021
∙ Paid

FYI in this coming Thursday’s sletter we’ve got exclusive SPY-ACCESS to a rare studio sale from the young prince of the Bootleg Tee Game, And After That, which will benefit Frontera Fund, providing safe access to abortions/healthcare to people in Texas’s Rio Grande Valley.

This will be a Classified subscriber ‘xclusie…

Meanwhile…

Every now & then at Blackbird Spyplane we invite you, the “beautiful & blessed” members of SpyNation, to ask profound questions about life, love & the jawn sciences, which we supply with unbeatable answers…

Sometimes?? People ask us to weigh in on contentious topics with our unbeatable sagagious takes like as if our name was Judge Spyplane, smacking down the gavel with authority.

And even though Blackbird Spyplane is a positive & kindvibed “style & nature newsletter” (as perceptive SpyFriend Dean Kissick accurately described us in a column a few weeks ago), we are capable of spicy categorical declarations, a.k.a….

📜😈Spyplane Holy Decrees 📜😇

Blackbird Spyplane is a 100% reader-supported masterpiece. Join our Classified Recon Tier today ☮️✌🏻


📜 Decree No. 1 📜

“Thoughts on ‘brand synergy’ when assessing a fit?” —@jamesrrrr

We’re basically brand-agnostic when it comes to the question of “fit synergy” — all other considerations being equal (such as fabric, fit, color, poppingness etc.), any piece from any designer can theoretically work with any piece from any other designer.

If anything, assembling clothes by multiple designers into an outfit is a great way to avoid looking like you went “straight off the rack” head to toe / a great way to avoid looking like you let a lookbook dress you…

The main scenario where “brand synergy” becomes an issue, I guess, is if you’re wearing a bunch of “conflicting logos” i.e. Nike socks with New Balance sneakers with an Adidas t-shirt or something.

But in that case our Spyplane Decree is that you have ensnared yourself in a lose-lose Catch-22: If all the big-a** logos you are wearing “clash” with each other, then you are wearing too many big-a** logos! And if all the big-a** logos you are wearing “synergize” … then you are wearing too many big-a** logos!

When people get invited to the Nike Company Store in Beaverton (an invitation that Blackbird Spyplane the well-connected “unbeatable recon” gods have unsurprisingly received on a couple occasions) they ask you to not wear competitors’ clothes and instead keep the s**t all-Nike while on the premises.

I can see adhering to a “brand synergy” policy in that context, i.e. as a matter of extremely site-specific courtesy. But if you find yourself out in these streets — or even at the damn gym — consciously & assiduously going “all stripes” or “all checks” in a fit and you aren’t a sponsored “ambassador” / Run-DMC in 1986??

There’s a dangerous possibility you’re “brand simping,” partner, and we know you’re better than that.


📜 Decree No. 2 📜

“Any special considerations for tucking into shorts?” — @Dirtsalad

Nope, our famous Tuck All Tops philosophy (which isn’t that you must tuck all tops, just that you can try to tuck any top you wish) has no shorts-specific sub-clauses...

How did the shirt tails make it through the mesh netting??

If it’s a long button-up tucked into small-inseam shorts, though, make sure the shirt tails don’t creep out of each leg 😜.


📜 Decree No. 3 📜

“Are graphic tees over?” — @accidentallypeeingontheseat

You can love graphic tees, like we do here at Blackbird Spyplane, and still acknowledge that we’ve absolutely hit “Peak Graphic Tee” in recent years, to the degree that virtually any vintage tee with “Y2K” energy sells for like $150 and up on Depop.

Every imaginable entity — pop stars, indie acts, politicians, legacy magazines, streetwear brands, high-fashion brands, podcasts, wine bars, restaurants, taco stands, movie studios, etc., etc., even great newsletters — seems to sling their own graphic tees these days, too.

First, let’s take a second to think about why graphic tees got so big circa 2021 … Two factors strike us as HIGHLY RELEVANT:

  1. The “democratization” of jawn-design — there is no garment with a lower barrier of entry to someone who has “a vision” and wants to get it out into the world fast ‘n’ easy. This is basically dope. You can cop a blank; slap whatever you want on it; and reap a (theoretically) high return on a (relatively) small investment — margins that make graphic tees appealing to all kinds of people, large and small, trying to make a buck. And the technology has become broadly accessible to not only design a jawn and get it produced but to put it in front of an amenable audience, too.

    1b. Relatedly, social media has made more people more conversant with “what’s popping,” and t-shirts represent an extremely easy way for jawns enthusiasts to “join the conversation,” in the sense that they’re near-universally rockable garments (even more so than baseball caps) that don’t (have to) cost very much. Which connects to —

  2. The “Instagram-ifaction” / “meme-ification” effect on fashion. We’ve lived in an increasingly cacophonous visual world for decades, and that seems truer than ever here in whatever era of the Web we’re in now. So it’s no surprise that graphic tees — the simplest way to “wear an image” — have been booming correspondingly.

    A robust neural pathway has been carved in our cortexes between the acts of “smashing the fave” on a pic <~> “smashing the RT” on a meme <~> and “smashing the cop” on an eye-catching graphic tee, in the sense that all three activate closely related parts of the brain, and closely related ways of engaging with contemporary visual culture.

    2b. When you cop a tee, you can take something “virtual and infinite” (i.e. an appealing image you saw online) and transform it into something “physical and limited” (a tee) and then of course render it virtual again by rocking the tee in a fit pic, and on and on…

“Wow, Blackbird Spyplane,” you’re saying right now. “Compelling and clear-eyed analysis as always. So — are graphic tees over?”

Well, the category is objectively BLOATED… the kilotons of water and cotton (not to mention underpaid labor) required to sustain that bloat is, like so many aspects of contemporary life, nauseatingly untenable… and among Mach 3+ jawns enthusiasts who value “surprise” and “freshness,” fatigue levels at seeing “yet another graphic tee” are correspondingly high.

But despite all that, graphic tees new and old still sing out to us, because they remain such a potent talisman / delivery system for creativity and emotion, whether that emotion’s nostalgia (in the case of, say, late-‘90s personal-computing tees); sentimentality (in the case of a collectible hunted down on eBay or a souvenir snagged on a vacation); fandom (in the case of a tee commemorating a favorite band or a favorite dope-joints newsletter); etc., etc.

In other words, people could stand to ease up on the damn graphic tees a bit — but they are not over, because at their core, graphic tees are too effective at what they do, and contain too much potential for true excellence, even amid the bloat, to die.


📜 Decree No. 4 📜

Thoughts on sleeve prints? — @Adrianlucariowong

They’re kinda torched, but we still like them! (Especially the Stüssy x Ken Price tee I swagger-jacked from SpyFriend Small Talk Studio, which has colorful images of Price’s gloopy ceramics running down the sleeves.)


📜 Decree No. 5 📜

When are ties coming back? — @Persiangroove

This post is for paid subscribers

Already a paid subscriber? Sign in
© 2026 Blackbird Spyplane Inc. · Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start your SubstackGet the app
Substack is the home for great culture